30 Days of DRM

Prof. Michael Geist is the Canada Research Chair of Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. Prof. Geist is working on 30 Days of DRM where each day for 30 days he brings something new to your attention in an attempt to examine the restrictions and limitations the Canadian government should include if Canada adopts a DMCA-like law.

Here’s hoping no other countries get a DMCA-like law and the countries that have them overturn these laws immediately. What’s in this for you, as an ordinary computer user? A law that will give copyright holders the ability to enact digital copy restriction systems that never expires (even if the underlying copyrighted work eventually enters the public domain); copy restriction programs that are illegal to circumvent or to tell anyone how to circumvent.

Your freedom of speech is at issue, as is your ability to use what you legally obtained in a way that benefits you preserving your works, your culture, and your investment in others’ copyrighted works.

The consequences of following freedom versus convenience.

Fedora Core 5 GNU/Linux does not come with the latest version of the X11 GUI display software, software virtually everyone using this system runs and depends on for drawing a graphical display. Ante Karamatić doesn’t agree with the decision and asks

Fedora, remeber RMS and the GNU movment? Do you recall what OpenSource is?

The FSF is quite clear that the free software movement and the younger open source movement are not the same. For years they’ve published an essay about this and its consequences. Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html or get a copy of the essay in “Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman”.

As for how much should one accomodate proprietary software, Canonical has made their choice very clear.

Continue reading

You don’t have to act that way.

On Slashdot, a technical discussion site, a poster tried to convince the readers that because the Free Software Foundation (which wrote the GNU GPL and is a big player in the free software movement) and the Motion Picture Association have the same power as licensors or defenders of licenses, one must see them the same way—oppressors that can squash your freedom to share and modify at their whim.

I don’t think so.

Continue reading

What XPAT-less NNTP servers could do to give their users XPAT support.

I’m starting a new tag with this article—Technical—where I’ll cover technical subjects with little or no explanation of the jargon. These topics are not intended for the novice or the uninitiated. Everyone’s free to read and participate in the discussion, of course, but sometimes I feel like getting to the heart of the matter more than I feel like setting up the discussion.

Chris Ilias quoted Giganews support on why XPAT isn’t supported on Giganews servers:

The XPAT command attempts to search through our entire spool of over 700 million articles, to match on a specific keyword, that is often found only in a handful of newsgroups. The command puts enough of a load on our servers, that several people using this at one time can affect the performance that all of our customers receive.

As one of the posters in that blog pointed out, this is somewhat misleading. XPAT only searches one group; a GROUP command must preceed an XPAT command. That reduces the number of articles being searched by a great deal. But what if it could be reduced further still?

Continue reading

An interview, a talk, and a book.

Richard M. Stallman gave an interview to Source21.nl during FOSDEM. Eben Moglen also gave a talk and took questions. This is available in two parts (1, 2). The second section has the Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are permitted in any medium provided this notice is preserved. license in it.

You can download a PDF copy of RMS’ book of essays Free Software, Free Society. My father bought me a copy when it was first printed.

The licenses for each work are embedded in the works, so passing on a copy of either file or both is all you need to do to share with a friend. If you wish to modify the book you can do so, license terms are on page 2.

Japan bans American GM-tainted long grain rice.

The BBC reports on Japan banning American long-grain GM rice. The ban will remain in effect until the US can say the rice no longer contains the genetically engineered variety. This ban will not affect the majority of American rice imported by Japan which is short and medium-grain.

The US agriculture secretary Mike Johanns said: There are no human health, food safety, or environmental concerns associated with this (genetically engineered) rice.. Johanns replaced Ann Veneman as US agriculture secretary. Veneman received high marks from trade and industry groups and held the office during an outbreak of BSE or “mad cow disease” in the US. Japan reacted to mad cow by inspecting every imported cow destined for the food supply. The US declared it wasn’t much of an issue and shortly thereafter other cows were found to have mad cow disease. Johanns has his work cut out for him if he wants to make the USDA more than a mouthpiece for industry and corporate globalization efforts.

Getting back to the Japanese long-grain rice ban: Why are we genetically modifying rice? Is it ostensibly to get vitamins we could get by eating a better diet in the first place? Is it to grow enough food to prevent starvation? If so, that effort has failed; people lack food around the world including in the US. Where does one find the results of rigorously testing GM food to make sure we’re not eating things that will harm us?

You need to see “The Corporation”

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: The Corporation is one of the most underrated movies. I concur with C. Middleton who said

I believe this is one of the best and most important documentary films to be made in many years.

This is an extraordinary film about the creation of the American corporation, its legal organizational model, its global economic dominance and its psychopathic tendencies, and its incredible ambition to influence every aspect of culture in its unrelenting pursuit of profit.

After viewing this film, it becomes all too evident that these large corporations have too much power, whose mandate is not the common good of the people, and who will go to any lengths, legally and otherwise, in the pursuit of profit and the bottom line.

This is one of very few movies I can watch multiple times. When I return to it I find intelligent questions and responses. If anything, this movie (in its 3-hour form) is too short as some questions go unanswered. The movie holds my attention for the duration and I want to see more.

Continue reading